- two lens set: 70-200 mm f/2.8 + 200 -500 mm f/5.6 1.4kg + 2.3kg lenses. Both can be shot wide open also at the long end with no regret. - tamron or sigma 150-200 f/6.3 at the long end 2 kg or more depending on model. To cover the short tele range probably again the 70-200 f/2.8 on the FX camera. So does the 70-200mm f/2.8 VR stand up to this latest examination of its abilities? Headline features . 70-200mm focal length range; fast f/2.8 constant maximum aperture; Optical image stabilization – 3 stops with automatic panning detection and 'active' mode; Ring-type ultrasonic focusing with full-time manual override The NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is a remarkable lens for video applications. Smooth, silent AF with virtually no focus breathing. Standard 77mm filter support. Superior optical image stabilization combines with the camera's* in-body image stabilization and Electronic VR. Bottom, Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR. Optics. 21 elements in 15 groups. 5 ED extra-low dispersion elements, which help reduce secondary axial chromatic aberration. Multicoating. Diaphragm. 9 blades. Round at larger apertures, nonagonal at smaller apertures. Coverage. FX, 35mm and DX. Focal Length. 70~200mm. 80-200 ED vs 70-200 2.8 vr1. I recently purchased a Nikon 80-200 2.8 ed paired with a nikon d500 to shoot high school football. The picture quality is incredible, its built like a tank and I love it. However the lens seems to back focus and miss focus more than I would like it to causing me to miss some shots. Just posted! Our new lens review of Nikon's top-end fast telezoom, the AF-S VR-Nikkor 70-200mm F2.8G ED-IF. This is the first in a series of reviews in which we'll be comparing it with similar lenses from Canon, Sigma and Tamron, using both APS-C and 35mm full frame cameras. (100% crop, Nikon D700, Nikon 70-200 VR (mk1) Then again, if you’re very concerned about sharpness and you actually don’t need f/2.8 that desperately, don’t hesitate to get the 70-200mm f/4 VR instead. If you’re a landscape photographer toting around a D800e, for example, the 70-200mm f/4 VR is definitely going to be a fantastic choice. Other than the slight softness and rather high CA from 200-300mm though, the performance of the 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 ED-IF AF-S VR Zoom Nikkor (yeesh, that's a mouthful) was really excellent. And Nikon Nikkor Z 70-180mm F2.8 Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm F2.8 VR S Nikon Nikkor Z 800mm F6.3 VR S Nikon Nikkor Z 85mm F1.2 S Nikon Nikkor Z 85mm F1.8 S Nikon Nikkor Z DX 12-28mm F3.5-5.6 PZ VR Nikon Nikkor Z DX 16-50mm F3.5-6.3 VR WP1d.

nikon 70 200 f2 8 vr review